Just before Christmas, my Twitter stream
was dominated by two themes. The first
was the 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF), which had finally concluded a
process of evaluating the research outputs of the UK’s Higher Education
institutions, and announced its rankings of the winners and losers in this
curious 6-yearly academic beauty contest. The euphoria, disappointment and
schadenfreude were palpable through the ether. Fortunately, the passive
aggressive swiping reached its nadir just at the point where everyone decided
it was time to shut up shop for the holidays. It’s almost as though they
planned it that way.
The second was the announcement of cuts to
local libraries, as the tail end of the credit crunch began to really kick public
services in England and Wales. Cardiff announced a series of significant cuts
to Library services, including budget cuts for the wonderful Central Library,
and the loss of seven branch libraries; Birmingham announced a consultation on
cuts to public services that included worrying developments for the City’s libraries,
including the magnificent Library
of Birmingham (which the City recently invested £188 million in developing
). For a wonderful eulogy to Birmingham’s Libraries, see this passionate
lament by Robert McNichol.
The stories are, of course, linked. How
many REF superstars got their start in their local library? How many people who
went on the research the arts, sciences, or medicine passed their O-level exams
because they were able to work in their local library after school or on
weekends? I’m no academic star, but the local library was an absolutely central
part of my education. I was the first in my family to go to University, and the
library was where I went when I needed to do to work on homework or projects.
When I was at primary school, I was enormously fortunate to have a decent
public library near our house in Essex – I could even go there myself on the
bus. I also used the magnificent Mitchell Library on holidays in Glasgow, and
the Hamburg central library for High School research. This experience enabled
me to develop what we now call information literacy: the understanding that no
matter how daunting the task at hand, there was a starting point. This could be
in the form of a book with references to other books; a cataloguing system that
enabled you to find them; or when all else failed (ok, let’s be honest, quite
often the starting point), asking a librarian for help. There was also peace
and quiet, a space to think and work, and the idea that there was a physical
and intellectual place for work, and study, and thought. There was also the
idea that working, reading, and studying was a good thing to do: Taking the bus
to the Hamburg Central Library and spending a rainy Saturday researching Acid
Rain (yes, I am that old) for a school project, was, well, kind of cool. And so I discovered what Betty Smith called 'the magic of learning things.'
Those of us who owe a lot to public libraries need to defend them. The best way to do this is to use them – take your kids to the local library. Borrow books rather than buying them. And while you are at it, meet your neighbors and find out what’s going on locally. We need to defend libraries, but the best way to do this is to develop a better understanding of how they serve users: they provide services that you may not even know about, like electronic resources (subscription-only genealogy services, and electronic resources, are available in public libraries in Wales, for example) and journals. They are still training people in information literacy, but now they are also many people’s best opportunity for developing digital literacy and navigating online sources. This matters when information is increasingly digital by default.
Those of us who owe a lot to public libraries need to defend them. The best way to do this is to use them – take your kids to the local library. Borrow books rather than buying them. And while you are at it, meet your neighbors and find out what’s going on locally. We need to defend libraries, but the best way to do this is to develop a better understanding of how they serve users: they provide services that you may not even know about, like electronic resources (subscription-only genealogy services, and electronic resources, are available in public libraries in Wales, for example) and journals. They are still training people in information literacy, but now they are also many people’s best opportunity for developing digital literacy and navigating online sources. This matters when information is increasingly digital by default.
But we need also to develop better evidence about the deeper impact of public libraries. Again, think of all the world-class research internationally carried out by scholars who got started in their local library. Multiply this over time. One of my PhD students, Calista Williams (@Ca7ista), is working on an AHRC-funded collaborative doctoral award with the Open University and the National Library of Wales. Her project includes analysis of the early readers of the National Library of Wales, and their subsequent publications and research. Historical Network Analysis of these library patrons, their publications, and their connections and influence, is showing some interesting patterns. Adopting a similar approach to assess the global impact of the research by those who started out as readers of public libraries would start to create an insight into incredible value of these institutions, and their services. This would also make a fascinating research project, and provide concrete evidence of the risk we will face as a society if we lose our public libraries.
No comments:
Post a Comment